Enable Efficient Risk Management and Transfer
CISOs, OT Facility Managers, Cybersecurity Practitioners, Executive Boards and Insurers need better quantification of cyber risks across their fleet of Operational Technology (OT) assets to enable efficient risk management and transfer.
DeNexus delivers an evidence-based solution for OT industrial stakeholders to gain visibility into each facility’s cyber exposure, calculate the probability and financial impact of potential cyber incidents, and prioritize risk mitigation based on ROI or other KPIs.
End-to-End Solution for Cyber Risk
Identify Exposures
Translate vulnerabilities in your OT infrastructure into potential risk for your business.
Quantify Cyber Risk
Evaluate the financial impact of cyber risk at all times across all your OT individual assets and entire portfolio. Know where your business is most at risk.
Prioritize Risk Mitigation Projects
Easily visualize how each risk mitigation project reduces your exposure and improves your risk profile.
Justify Cybersecurity Investments
Use risk mitigation ROI analyses to make informed decisions on where to invest first.
Compare to Peers
Benchmark your cyber risk posture against your industry peers and across your fleet of assets.
Optimize Risk Transfer
Use our outputs to guide your cybersecurity and risk management strategy, including cyber insurance.
A New Approach to OT Cyber Risk
CISO - CFO Collaboration
Cyber risk is a technology AND a business issue. DeNexus gives CISOs and CFOs a solution to collaborate and prioritize cyber investments.
Risk Visibility at All Levels
DeNexus aggregates the risk across all your sites and delivers a clear picture of the potential impact of cyber incidents on your business.
Optimized Budget
DeNexus empowers you to prioritize cybersecurity efforts and allocate resources by showing where you are most at risk
Rich Cyber Risk Metrics
DeNexus shows the highest risk vulnerabilities, access vectors and sites to CISOs and the cybersecurity projects with the highest ROI and mitigation impact to CFOs.
Analysis is available for each site or a grouping of sites with comparison to industry peers.
Explore DeRISKTM
From UWQs to Underwriting Signal: 5 Insurance Use Cases for OT Cyber Maturity
Cyber underwriters know the problem well. Underwriting questionnaires (UWQs) use different terms. Teams interpret the same answer in different ways. As a result, similar applicants can produce very different underwriting signals. ENISA has described questionnaires as an important way to estimate a customer’s cyber posture and compare applicants, while also noting the lack of a common assessment language. (ENISA)
8 Practical Use Cases for a Harmonized OT Cybersecurity Maturity Model
If Cyber Maturity is more Standardized and Consistent, What Can this Enable?
Cybersecurity professionals don’t struggle to find maturity models. We struggle with the downstream effects of inconsistent semantics, inconsistent scoring, and inconsistent mapping:
Why OT Security Maturity Scores Get Stuck — and How to Fix the Reporting
The purpose of this document is to harmonize and reconcile the existing CMMI, NIST CSF, and C2M2 maturity models to allow effortless mapping, conversion, or adoption of these cyber maturity frameworks. The goal is not to invent a fourth maturity framework, it is to identify on behalf of the global community and make available publicly, this mapping between these frameworks. At first glance our deliverables may appear as a new framework, but it is harmonization of existing frameworks.
One of the most frustrating things in OT cybersecurity? Working hard for two years, making real progress — and then watching a maturity assessment come back with the same score as the year before.
It's not that the work wasn't done. It's that most maturity models weren't built to capture formative progress — the architecture, the tooling rollouts, the process definitions that happen before you can claim a higher level.
That's exactly what our Director of OT Cybersecurity, Donovan Tindill, sat down to talk about on a recent podcast episode. Donovan has spent the last 25 years assessing OT environments, and he's seen this pattern play out over and over. His answer: a publicly available methodology to reconcile the three major maturity frameworks — CMMI, NIST CSF, and C2M2 — into one consistent, defensible model.